'Exo-Uranus' Discovered Around Distant Star


An infrared composite image of the two hemispheres of Uranus obtained by the Keck Observatory in Hawaii. Does this newly-discovered exoplanet resemble the blue hue of our familiar ice giant?
Keck Observatory
For the first time, astronomers have announced the discovery of an exoplanet that they believe could resemble our solar system’s ‘ice giants’ Uranus or Neptune.
In the study, published in the The Astrophysical Journal, Radek Poleski and his team from Ohio State University identified the alien world orbiting a star in a binary system some 25,000 light-years away in the direction of Sagittarius. The binary system is composed of a star approximately two-thirds the mass of our sun, whereas its stellar partner is only one-sixth of a solar mass. The ‘exo-Uranus’ orbits the larger star.
NEWS: Supersized Storms Spotted Erupting on Uranus
However, at first glance, this new world seems anything but Uranus-like (or, indeed, Neptune-like), it’s actually four times more massive than the planet that we know and love. But the key here is that it has a Uranus-like orbit, a characteristic that could make it the first exoplanet to possess a Uranus-like composition — though this cannot be tested as the world is too distant for us to study its chemical makeup.
Both Uranus and Neptune are distinct from the other two gas giants in our solar system (Jupiter and Saturn) in that their thick atmospheres are loaded with methane ices; a factor that gives these two planets their blueish hue. Located further away from the sun, it seems that their orbital distance has allowed Uranus and Neptune’s icy evolution.
“Nobody knows for sure why Uranus and Neptune are located on the outskirts of our solar system, when our models suggest that they should have formed closer to the sun,” said Andrew Gould, also of Ohio State and co-investigator. “One idea is that they did form much closer, but were jostled around by Jupiter and Saturn and knocked farther out.”
ANALYSIS: Uranus Pathfinder: Mission to the Mysterious Ice Giant
This distant exo-Uranus was discovered when the world orbited in front of its star. In doing so, the world’s gravitational field, which warps space-time, created a ‘microlens’ event where the star’s light became focused and brightened from Earth’s perspective.
Microlensing events happen purely by chance and can happen anywhere in the galaxy, so we have networks of observatories around the globe that are constantly surveying the whole sky in the hope of spotting these transient brightenings. In this case, the 1.3-meter Warsaw Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory in Chile of the international Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) identified two separate microlensing events — one in 2008 that revealed the presence of the main star and hinted at the presence of a planet, and a second event in 2010 that confirmed the planet and the presence of a smaller binary partner.
By combining the two microlensing observations, the team was able to measure the two stars’ masses and derive the exoplanet’s mass and orbital distance.
Interestingly, it’s the presence of the smaller binary partner that may help explain the origin of this exo-Uranus and, in turn, may also offer clues as to how our Uranus and Neptune came to migrate to the far-flung orbits they occupy today.
ANALYSIS: Project Icarus: The Gas Mines of Uranus
“Maybe the existence of this Uranus-like planet is connected to interference from the second star,” said Gould. “Maybe you need some kind of jostling to make planets like Uranus and Neptune.”
“Only microlensing can detect these cold ice giants that, like Uranus and Neptune, are far away from their host stars,” said Poleski. “This discovery demonstrates that microlensing is capable of discovering planets in very wide orbits.” This is in contrast to other methods of exoplanetary detection, such as the transit method (used by NASA’s Kepler space telescope to detect small worlds orbiting close to their host stars) and the radial velocity method (that is used by telescopes to detect the wobble of stars caused by the gravitational effects of massive planets in tight orbits).
“We were lucky to see the signal from the planet, its host star, and the companion star. If the orientation had been different, we would have seen only the planet, and we probably would have called it a free-floating planet,” Gould added.
Source: Ohio State University via Phys.org
src discovery

Previous
Next Post »